essay on emily dickinson poems https://chfn.org/fastered/fumar-viagra/36/ media communications dissertation epatite b e cialis super cialis with dapoxine https://www.carrollkennelclub.org/phrasing/science-essay-in-english/6/ asu anthropological research papers cialis narragansett pier thesis of civil disobedience by thoreau stem cell research essay source url hombre se toma 15 pastillas de viagra https://campingunlimited.org/dissertation/451-theme-essay-conclusion/26/ buy history dissertation conclusion https://cadasb.org/pharmacy/does-premarin-make-you-feel-better/13/ https://footcaregroup.org/perpill/ets-levitra-laigle-mont-blanc/35/ source source site rushmore film essay advertisement essay ielts https://smartfin.org/science/lasix-to-prevent-arrythmia/12/ help me write a business letter flagyl chi nei tsang https://homemods.org/usc/the-book-thief-essay/46/ sample of a research paper written in apa format https://chfn.org/fastered/otc-similar-to-viagra/36/ coursework essay writing https://georgehahn.com/playboy/el-viagra-es-malo-en-jovenes/15/ viagra como se compra https://www.carrollkennelclub.org/phrasing/research-techniques-for-the-health-sciences/6/ https://efm.sewanee.edu/faq/essays-on-human-sexuality/22/ The House Leadership’s plan for repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act is now public for all the world to describe, dissect and debate. Entitled the American Health Care Act, the legislation first stop will be the House Energy and Commerce Committee. At the same time, the House Ways & Means committee will consider budget language to support the Republican repeal and replace effort. For articles on what it does, please check out my Flipboard magazine.
To call the legislation dead on arrival is unfair. However, even ahead of its first hearings, the proposal is looking under the weather. Conservatives in the House have long expressed their displeasure with key elements of the Leadership’s proposal like the inclusion of refundable tax credits to help Americans pay their health insurance premiums. And four Republican Senators with what the House bill would do to Medicaid. If the four Republican Senators hang together and together they could block any health care reform bill. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell needs at least 50 votes in the Senate to repeal the financial aspects of Obamcare through the budget reconciliation process. There are 52 GOP Senators in his caucus. If he loses four of them he’ll need two Democrats to come to his rescue. The price for their assistance will be extremely high.
In short, as I’ve posted previously, what Speaker Paul Ryan and the Republican Leadership put forward this week is highly unlikely to be what emerges from Congress … assuming health care reform does emerge from Congress.
Which may be a good thing. Because the American Health Care Act fails to address in any meaningful way what should be a critical goal of any health care reform proposal: making health care affordable. Washington is fixated on how Americans get health care coverage. Should there be government exchanges?. Should premiums be subsidized? Should there be restrictions on how insurers set premiums for coverage? And so on. All of these are vital, important issues. But they’re playing around the edges of public policy when the real solution is at the core.
This isn’t just opinion. It’s math. Consider: the Affordable Care Act requires carriers to spend the vast majority of every premium dollar they collect for medical care. In the individual and small group markets, 80% of premiums must go to cover medical care or carriers must refund enough premium to reach that level. For larger employers, the medical expense target is 85% of premium. The remaining premium dollars are what carriers can use for paying claims, customer service, negotiating discounts with medical providers, advertising, legal expenses, staffing, HR departments, distribution costs, profit (or retained earnings for non-profits) and any other administrative costs. (Incidentally, I don’t see any reference to these provisions of the ACA, which, I assume, means they stay in place. If I’m wrong, please let me know in the comments section.)
If lawmakers want to make health insurance coverage affordable, they’re going to have to make medical care affordable, because that’s where the money is. Zero out insurer’s operational expense and overall premiums would go down less than 20%. That’s a sizeable amount. However, in three or four years we’re back where we are today thanks to medical inflation. And there’s no way to eliminate all administrative costs. Someone has to process the claims or answer consumer’s questions. And they expect to get paid. And someone has to pay for their phone, desk and computers. And someone has to support their equipment. And so on.
Yet medical care representing 80-to-85 percent of health insurance premiums. Reduce this side of the ledger by 20% and premiums fall 17% — roughly the same as eliminating 100% of insurer’s operational costs.
If President Donald Trump and Congress are serious about reducing the cost of health insurance, they need to figure out how to reduce the cost of medical care. There’s plenty of ideas out there (a topic for a future post). And, to be fair, they’ve mentioned a few. But there’s a political reality that explains why most of the rhetoric around Pennsylvania Avenue concerns the cost of coverage: no one has lost an election by attacking health insurance companies. They’re one of the safest pinatas in American politics. On the other hand, doctors and hospitals are politically dangerous to take on. Voters actually like them.
Regulating health insurance so consumers get a fair deal is important. Lowering the cost of medical care is critical while also reducing insurance premiums. It’s just harder.Perhaps that’s why the Republican proposal is called the American Health Care Act. It would be wrong to use the word “affordable.”