see url https://www.aestheticscienceinstitute.edu/medical/nursing-consideration-for-lasix/100/ autism research paper conclusion cuantas pastillas de viagra debo tomar enter https://chanelmovingforward.com/stories/esl-dissertation-chapter-editor-for-hire-au/51/ levitra mas barata crestor with calcium essays on the formation of human character above knee amputation prosthesis gait go here genericviagra4 best rhetorical analysis essay ghostwriters site online approach college essay it process write alkoxide essay from alcohols https://beaschoolnurse.com/doctor/getting-rid-of-love-handles-female-viagra/31/ 105 pound female viagra https://eagfwc.org/men/purchase-viagra-thailand/100/ another word for finally in an essay reference bible research paper charles dickens essay by george orwell get link community service powerpoint presentation follow link source site where to buy viagra uk can you get viagra on the nhs https://earthwiseradio.org/editing/sample-thesis-of-civil-engineering/8/ buy no rx prednisone https://zacharyelementary.org/presentation/essay-on-discipline-with-examples/30/ cover letter military pilot barbituricos nombre commercial y generico de cialis Federal District Court Judge Roger Vinson declared the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act unconstitutional. The ruling in a suit brought by governors and attorneys general from 26 states is the most sweeping legal decision against President Barack Obama’s health care reform package.
Specifically, Judge Vinson decision focused on the legislation’s requirement that all Americans obtain health care coverage (the individual mandate). He found the individual mandate violated the Commerce Clause (while in the same decision dismissing plaintiff’s claim the PPACA was unconstitutional because of the changes it makes to the Medicaid program
All of this was expected. What was a bit of suprise is that Judge Vinson went further stating: “Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire act must be declared void.” Compare this to the December decision by U.S. District Judge Henry Hudson who ruled in a suit brought by the state of Virginia that the individual mandate was unconstitutional. Judge Hudson, however, determined that those provisions of the health care reform law that did not depend on the individual mandate “are legal and can proceed.”
Reuters describes Judge Vinson as struggling with the decision to invalidate the entire law as he recognized the decision “will have indeterminable implications” – which is legalese for “this shakes things up a bit, doesn’t it?” In the end, however, as reported by the New York Times, he determined that the individual mandate “exceeds the regulatory powers granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Judge Vinson wrote that the provision could not be rescued by an associated clause in Article I that gives Congress broad authority to make laws ‘necessary and proper’ to carrying out its designated responsibilities.”
Significantly, Judge Vinson decided not to stop implementation of the PPACA from moving forward pending appeals. Nonetheless, one of the the lawyers for the states, David Rivkin, Jr., was quoted as declaring that “With regard to all parties, the statue is dead. The statute is as if it never was.”
Well, not really. If Judge Vinson had suspended or enjoined the law Mr. Rivkin would have something more than enthusiasm to stand upon. But by allowing work on implementing reform to move forward, this decision becomes part of a mix of several cases. With District Judges ruling to strike down part (and now all) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and others upholding the health care reform law the next step is for Appellate Courts to hear appeals of these decisions.
Eventually the question of whether the PPACA is constitutional or not will be determined by the U.S. Supreme Court. Which will be fascinating to watch. While Justices prize their independence, the fact is that they all have a point of view based on a mix of their understanding of the law and constitution, their personal experience, and their political ideologies – not in equal measure. While there may be surprises, what this could mean is that the fate of President Obama’s signature legislative accomplishment is in the hands of Justice Anthony Kennedy. The reason is that four of the Justices are expected to be skeptical of expanding the Commerce Clause while four are likely to be more comfortable with the idea. Justice Kennedy is viewed as a moderate and the swing vote on the Court as currently comprised.
In the meantime implementation of the PPACA by regulators, carriers and others will continue apace – as will legislative attempts in Congress and state legislatures to modify (or repeal) the law. All of which means that Judge Vinson’s declaration that the PPACA is unconstitutional is an interesting chapter in the history of reforming health care and health care coverage in America, but it’s only a chapter in a very long book.
For those who prefer to listen to their legal analysis, NPR offers a clear presentation of Judge Vinson’s decision.