levitra whites landing dosage of prednisone needed for dogs source komposisi obat zithromax https://eagfwc.org/men/cialis-how-long-does-it-last/100/ sildenafil viagra vergleich farmacia online italia cialis generico portugal patient journey nursing essay https://homemods.org/usc/descriptive-essay-beach/46/ pay someone to do your essay fun with cialis https://www.pugetsoundnavymuseum.org/paraphrasing/thesis-navigation-menu/24/ aftermath of world war 2 essay topics go go site https://carlgans.org/report/essay-on-terrorism-in-pakistan-in-urdu-language/7/ thesis statements ender's game at what age one should take viagra cell component involved essay nicolaus copernicus summary essay http://kanack.org/statement/phd-thesis-on-mobile-cloud-computing/26/ case study zapatoes inc https://equalitymi.org/citrate/venta-viagra-linea/29/ source link business plan sample nurse staffing agency follow url https://norfolkspca.com/medservice/kamagra-uk-sales/14/ enter source url viagra femenino + crema https://plastic-pollution.org/trialrx/propecia-the-crack-whore/31/ cialis rose hill Few were surprised when a Federal Court struck down San Francisco’s Health Security Ordinance on ERISA grounds. There were elements of the city’s ordinance that seemed to invite a suit and to have been drafted on shaky legal grounds. What’s interesting is whether the Health Care Security and Cost Reduction Act (Assembly Bill X1-1), passed earlier this month by the state Assembly and scheduled for a Senate Health Committee hearing on January 16th, will fare any better. University of Mississippi law professor Paul Secunda, writing in the Workplace Prof Blog and Anthony Wright in a December 27th posting on the Health Access blog think it will. Chris Reed of the Union-Tribune and Daniel Weintraub at the Sacramento Bee think it won’t.
The reality is, no one knows what a court will decide until a court decides. (Those three years at law school weren’t a total waste!) The District Court ruling, Golden Gate Restaurant Association v City and County of San Francisco, will be appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. And anything could happen there.
What’s important to keep in mind is that previous ERISA decisions by Circuit Courts, such as that of the Fourth Circuit when it overturned a Maryland law aimed at Walmart, are not controlling in California. A decision from the Ninth Circuit will be. That’s just the way Federal Appeals Court decisions work — they’re only controlling in Federal Courts in the states comprising that circuit.
ERISA has been the bane of state and local health care reform efforts for years and is one of the reasons national health care reform is likely to be required. While the authors of ABX1-1 have taken great care to avoid running afoul of ERISA, that’s a far from easy task. Just ask the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. Better still, ask the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.