go https://www.pugetsoundnavymuseum.org/paraphrasing/theory-of-knowledge-essay-topics-2010/24/ https://www.rmhc-reno.org/project/essay-evil-good-vs/25/ http://kanack.org/statement/proof-my-research-paper/26/ essays that i can buy https://medpsychmd.com/nurse/buy-cheap-cialis-on-line/63/ follow site success definition essay examples order revia online click cialis maple heights https://dsaj.org/buyingmg/scherzo-con-il-viagra/200/ https://www.arvadachamber.org/verified/how-to-delete-all-emails-from-one-sender-gmail-app-iphone/49/ https://hobcawbarony.org/coursework/a-happiest-day-of-my-life-essay/27/ language therapy jobtabs job search and resume 2011 5 0 0 1676 essays heroism odyssey essay on dance is my passion watch https://www.csb.pitt.edu/rating/best-way-to-write-an-essay-for-college/41/ https://scottsdaleartschool.org/checker/writing-supplement-essays/33/ https://library.citytech.cuny.edu/podcast/article.php?publish=authenticity-in-art-essay-example 300 5mg cialis introduction for thesis citation reprinted essay go to link abigail williams character analysis essay will pay somebody to do school paper air pollution research paper farmacia venta de viagra dissolve viagra drink relationship customer Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s challenge was to blend the liberal Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions health care reform legislation with the more moderate bill passed by the Senate Finance Committee. One of the most contentious issues concerned the creation of a public insurance plan to compete with private carriers — the Senate HELP Committee called for one; the Senate Finance Committee explicitly rejected the concept.
The problem for Senator Reid was that some members of his caucus were threatening to oppose a bill without a government-run plan while others were making the same threat if the legislation included such a provision. And Senator Reid’s number one priority was to find a compromise that could garner the 60 votes needed to pass a bill in the Senate.
His decision: include a public option in the blended health care reform legislation he will be bringing to the Senate floor in the next few weeks, but include restrictions on it that, while appealing to moderates, are not enough to turn off liberals.
The legislation is being reviewed by the Congressional Budget Office and is not yet available online. But Senator Reid has announced he will allow states to opt out of participating in the public plan. This approach is very appealing to moderate Democrats such as Senator Tom Carper, who voted against one of the attempts to add a government plan to the Senate Finance bill. According to the National Underwriter, Senator Carper “has been a key advocate of letting states opt out of the public option health program and create their own alternatives to private plans.”
Not all moderates in the Senate are embracing the compromise yet. The Associated Press quote Senators Olympia Snowe, Ben Nelson and Mary Landrieu as all expressing various levels of skepticism. But the White House is on-board with the compromise and will likely bring a great deal of pressure on these moderates to get at least vote in favor of ending the inevitable Republican filibuster on the health care reform legislation. By including an opt-out, these moderates can support the procedural movement and claim they were putting state rights above their opposition to the public option.
The other provision Senator Reid has apparently included in his compromise is that, in the words of Senate Charles Schumer as quoted in the National Underwriter article, “Any public option plan ought to operate on a level playing field with private insurers, and it ought to meet the same state requirements and use similar provider rates.”
How this limitation would be imposed on a government-run plan is, as yet, unknown. But if the public option must play by state-specific rules, it would be a step toward a more level playing field between the public option and private carriers — and certainly closer to the level playing field than is contemplated in the House version of health care reform.
What’s ironic is that, as I’ve written previously, a public option is likely to accomplish its primary public policy goal — reduce medical costs — only if it is allowed advantages in the marketplace such as the power to unilaterally impose reimbursement rates on providers. By restricting it to the same rules and pricing regulations as private carriers might meet, its effectiveness is reduced.
Whether a public health insurance option is part of the reform legislation eventually passed by Congress is far from certain. But Senator Reid’s proposed compromises keeps the possibility alive. At the same time, the restrictions he’s suggesting reduces the impact of the government plan. That’s a reality liberals will not accept willingly.
Senator Reid is doing what Majority Leaders have to do: find the middle ground that can garner the support of 60 Senators. It’s not an easy task. Nor will the result please everyone. It might even please no one.