chemoessay and essay are alike https://chfn.org/fastered/prescription-s-medicines-fda/36/ do my homework for me free respiratory therapist essay essay l4 on 5 source link go https://abt.edu/bestsellers/age-limit-for-using-viagra/22/ mixing levitra with cialis https://heystamford.com/writing/write-my-essay-review/8/ https://psijax.edu/medicine/comprar-levitra-peru/50/ generic cialis colombia news 1984 brave new world comparative essay ideas puedo comprar viagra en farmacias http://kanack.org/statement/sample-research-paper-on-cell-phones/26/ mejor efecto del viagra el viagra y sus genericos go site how to safely stop lamictal essay my working experience essay on global economic meltdown https://chanelmovingforward.com/stories/book-report-principle-centered-leadership/51/ http://compbio.mit.edu/wiki/images/?pdf=process-essay-topic-sentences cialis daily use dosing fertility drugs after clomid https://www.rmhc-reno.org/project/christmas-day-essay-hindi/25/ corong resdung herbal viagra https://ramapoforchildren.org/youth/popular-dissertation-chapter-ghostwriters-websites-for-masters/47/ https://thejeffreyfoundation.org/newsletter/paperless-society-essay/17/ get link 5 paragraph essay worksheet for 7th grade Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez has long supported a single payer health care system for California and prefers that solution to his own health care reform plan, Assembly Bill X1-1, passed by the Assembly earlier this month and awaiting consideration by the State Senate on January 16th.
Yet, he takes Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger at his word that he will not sign a single payer bill and notes that the Governor previously vetoed such legislation, Senate Bill 840. Consequently, he encourages progressives to recognize this reality and line up behind ABX1-1, health care reform that can be enacted.
The Speaker made this plea explicit in posts on several liberal blogs (that’s one, here’s another and another) last week. In his post, Speaker Nunez warned progressives that “it would be a shame if disappointment over the chances of single payer (and I’m a supporter of single payer) detracted from the opportunity we have to do a strong measure of good for the millions of Californians who don’t have, or are having trouble affording, health care.”
His plea for liberals to line up behind ABX1-1 seems to be having an effect. Consumers Union is on board. Several labor organizations, including the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), are backing the bill. They, and others, are finding ABX1-1 to be a very satisfactory partial health care reform loaf.
Mike Russo, Health Care Advocate and Staff Attorney for the California Public Interest Research Group (CalPIRG), does an excellent job in parsing the legislation and pointing out the reason progressives should support it: “ABX1-1 sets out an entirely new framework for health care in this state, and it’s critical to focus on making that framework the best it can be, rather than rejecting it for an unsustainable, intolerable status quo.” Whether you agree or not with his politics, his post is insightful and well worth reading.
The Left is far from united on ABX1-1. Senator Sheila Kuehl, the author of SB 840, remains opposed. So is the California Nurses Association. But the fact that proponents of a single payer scheme for California are not united against ABX1-1 is a major victory for Speaker Nunez and Governor Schwarzenegger.
And it puts pressure on Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata to push the legislation through his house. Senator Perata, however, has placed the future of the bill in the hands of the Legislative Analyst’s office. He has asked them for an analysis of the legislation’s impact on the state’s finances. If the result is a report showing the state can’t afford ABX1-1, it would be hard for Senator Perata to bring the bill forward. If the analysis shows the health care reform package would help the state’s finances, he’s pretty much pledged to get the bill passed.
But what if the Legislative Analyst calculates a budget neutral impact or even that the impact is impossible to determine? In other words, what if it’s a “tie?” In that case, having a substantial portion of the liberal community advocating for the bill is to result in Senator Perata pushing ABX1-1 through the Senate. In other words, the support of liberals breaks the tie in favor of the legislation passing.
Whether ABX1-1 should pass the Senate is still an open question for many of us. What’s interesting about the dynamic taking place in the progressive universe, however, is how it runs counter to business as usual..
True believes on either end of the political spectrum often take a “purist’s” approach to issues. It’s all or nothing. In their willingness to accept what they see as a partial victory, liberals have increased the odds California will pass comprehensive health care reform legislation next month. That’s hardly business as usual.