https://www.carrollkennelclub.org/phrasing/5-paragraph-expository-essay/6/ https://footcaregroup.org/perpill/erektionsstrung-viagra-hilft-nicht/35/ argumentative essay topics related to nursing apa style essay example paper lamictal and sex https://projectathena.org/grandmedicine/kamagra-utisci/11/ custom problem solving writers services https://equalitymi.org/citrate/adult-doseage-for-cymbalta/29/ enter can't afford abilify blockbuster essay dapoxetine 30 mg efectos example of rogerian argument essay civil services essay paper 2012 movie help with writing a thesis https://tffa.org/businessplan/essay-why-you-study-english/70/ master thesis kuleuven letteren apa guidelines for dissertation https://aaan.org/indications/can-you-buy-prednisone-over-the-counter-for-dogs/27/ https://mainejournal.umaine.edu/wp-content/uploads/index.php?generic=cialis-diario-funciona how do i write my personal statement on my cv writing a self introduction speech source site of admission essay writing source cipralex higher doses of cialis college basketball one and done rule essay how to write a tok essay viagra on radio can cialis be bought over the counter in canada how to write an evaluation paper The Assembly Health Committee will be considering the three major health care reform plans tomorrow in Sacramento. The conventional wisdom is that the Committee will pass ABX1-1 (Nunez), the Democratic Leadership’s health care reform plan, on a party line vote. ABX1-2, the Governor’s plan, and ABX1-8 (Villines), the Republican proposal, are expected to fail along party line votes. Few expect an announcement of a deal among Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez and Senate President Pro Temp Don Perata to be announced before, during or after the hearing. Update: Now I’m hearing ABX1-2 will NOT be heard tomorrow. We’ll see.
This means observers will be looking for clues as to where negotiations stand. For those of you planning to listen in on the Assembly Health Committee hearing (please see the previous post for instructions on how to do this) what you may want to listen for is what version of ABX1-1 passes.
If it’s the current version with no substantial changes, it probably means negotiations between Governor Schwarzenegger and Speaker Nunez are not going well. No meaningful amendments means the Speaker is holding tight to his original negotiating position. This in turn means the legislation will likely pass the full Assembly virtually unchanged on Monday, November 26th. Then attention will turn to the State Senate. If a compromise is to be reached, it will be while the legislation is working it’s way through the upper house.
If, however, Speaker Nunez accepts substantial compromises to the bill, changes which move it closer to Governor’s plan, then a deal more likely and imminent. For example, if the Speaker accepts changes to the way the exemption from the mandate to purchase coverage is made, that’s a sign negotiations are going well. So would a further reduction in the payroll tax Democrats want to impose on the California businesses to finance reforms (they recently reduced their tax target from 7.5 percent of a company’s Social Security wages to 6.5 percent; the Governor is proposing a 5.5 percent payroll tax). Movement toward the Governor’s approach to reducing the burden of the tax on the state’s smallest businesses would also be a sign of progress. Another sign of progress: if the Governor’s staff testifies that premium subsidies should be raised toward the Assembly Democrat’s levels.
Then there’s financing. Both the Governor and the Speaker require some extraordinary measures to finance their plans (This, of course, assumes they’ve accurately estimated the cost of their reforms — the odds of which are extremely unlikely). The Speaker imposes a $2.00 per pack tax on cigarettes; the Governor would lease the state lottery. A move by one side towards the other’s financing plan would be a huge step toward an eventual compromise.
Not all changes are substantial, however. For example, ABX1-1 revives some of the group health insurance reforms that had been a part of Assembly Bill 8, the previous Democratic health care reform plan. If those are removed it’s a sign of progress, but not as significant as other amendments might be. The Governor’s staff has been intent on minimizing the risk of law suits based on ERISA. They would prefer not touching group coverage directly at all.
One thing to keep in mind is that the rhetoric of the hearing is less important than changes, if any, to ABX1-1. Everyone will be playing to their core constituencies. The key is to listen for what the participants do, not what they say.