2009 versus 1993 Health Care Reform: The Difference is Consensus

a small act of kindness can make big difference essay and composition bookrags lord of the flies essay nuig thesis library here enter follow link https://www.lapressclub.org/hypothesis/conclusion-diabetes-essay/29/ https://homemods.org/usc/conclusion-for-abortion-essay/46/ key stage 2 english practice papers https://lawdegree.com/questions/creativity-problem-solving/46/ https://www.carrollkennelclub.org/phrasing/good-writing-tips/6/ an animal farm essay prompt https://www.rmhc-reno.org/project/university-of-southern-california-mfa-creative-writing/25/ viagra nitrogen monoxide go to site crestor and side effects https://thembl.org/masters/low-case-study-meaning/60/ go https://journeysmobilevet.com/edimprove/do-you-tell-your-doctor-get-viagra/26/ https://earthwiseradio.org/editing/essay-about-symbolism/8/ paper custom watermark https://academicminute.org/paraphrasing/ap-us-essay-questions/3/ essay deforestation malayalam how to write self introduction letter for scholarship cialis wo bestellen erfahrungen are school uniforms a good or bad idea argumentative essay structure differences between mom and dad essay computer essay quotations https://tffa.org/businessplan/easyjet-extra-legroom/70/ my free meds viagra click criminal and civil law essay Politically, 2009 and 1993 will share some similarities.  A new Democratic President takes over after years of a Republican White House. The new president will be able to work with a Congress firmly in Democratic control. Both soon-to-be President Barack Obama and then President Bill Clinton entered office during difficult economic times. And as candidates both made health care reform a top issue in their successful campaigns.

But 2009 is far different from 1993 in many ways. Concerning health care reform the political environment are strikingly different.  In 1993 President Clinton asked First Lady Hillary Clinton to take the lead. As I’ve noted previously, her insular and heavy handed approach helped doom that effort. But she had lots of help. There was broad disagreement about the nature of the problem, let alone the solution. Interest groups fought the Clinton Administration reforms vigorously and effectively. Given the lack of consensus and clumsy politics, it’s eventual defeat, in retrospect, seems inevitable. 

In 2009, the political environment will be far different. That there is a crisis in America’s health care system is broadly accepted. Out-of-control medical costs, and the ever increasing health insurance premiums they cause, are harming the financial security of families and the economic viability of companies. Tolerance for the large number of uninsured in the country is near an end.

There’s not only wide agreement that there is a problem, there’s a growing consensus on what the solution might be. The several proposals already circulating in Washington overlap with one another and the approach advocated by Candidate Obama. Interest groups and academics who waged pitched battles in 1983 are finding common ground as 2009 approaches.

This was strikingly clear in a recent broadcast of NPR’s To The Point. Host Warren Olney interviewed representatives from Families USA (generally considered a liberal health care reform advocacy group, America’s Health Insurance Plans (the carrier’s trade association),  the United States Chamber of Commerce and an academic from UC Berkeley. Their perspectives differed, but what was striking was the amount of agreement they expressed. True, there were no representatives of medical care providers on the show, but the common ground expressed by these four may not have been possible in 1993. And, as is usual when Mr. Olney is conducting the interviews, the show was very informative. (I recommend making the time to listen to this episode, entitled “Barack Obama and ‘Universal’ Healthcare Reform“).

Consensus in December 2008 does not guarantee a smooth and easy process to enacting comprehensive health care reform in 2009. The debate will be vigorous and heated. There will be winners and losers — and the losers will not take their lumps quietly. But unlike in 1993, when the top priority of many stakeholders was to stop health care reform, in 2009 their approach will be to help develop the right reform. Now that is a big difference.

2 thoughts on “2009 versus 1993 Health Care Reform: The Difference is Consensus

  1. Mr. Katz mentions Families USA and describes that group as “generally considered a liberal health care reform advocacy group”. The leading board member of Families USA is an insurance insider from Blue Cross of Massachusetts, which just forced through health insurance mandates on its citizens. With the collapse of the American and apparently the global economy, how long will healthinsurance mandates survive? You cabnnot save a system based upon greed forever. At some point healthcare will need be socialized or a lot of people will need be removed from consideration somehow. Progressive taxation would go a long way towards funding expanded Medicare Medicaid. Taking the publicly funded teaching hospitals and returning their discoveries to the public domain or governmental control would go a long way towards reducing medicinal costs. After more than 35 years of private HMOs you can’t fix this broken system by forcing more privatized healthcare on an ailing system.

  2. The power of health is in our hands. If we make small changes each day to improve our health and our earth then our longevity will be increased by monumental steps. Cherish this life, planet, and body because you probably won’t get another chance.

Comments are closed.